This lengthy discussion with Paul Gottfried and Joseph Cotto of the SF Review of Books, on their “thinking man’s current events show,” was so much fun, despite the solemn subject:

This lengthy discussion with Paul Gottfried and Joseph Cotto of the SF Review of Books, on their “thinking man’s current events show,” was so much fun, despite the solemn subject:
Democrats, Elections, Left-Liberalism And Progressivisim, Media, Propaganda
It looks like the only group routing for the demented, intersectional, social injustice succubus demons standing for president in 2020 are members of the media. Only media was turned on by Kamala Harris, that insufferable scold with her nasal twang.
Regular Democrats are gravitating toward the old white guy.
Smart. There is great comfort to be had in the concept.
Joe Biden has amassed a formidable 27 percent lead over the field of Democratic hopefuls in South Carolina, buoyed by solid support from African American voters, a poll released Thursday showed.
The former vice president has 39 percent of support, putting him far ahead of his closest challenger, Sen. Kamala Harris, at 12 percent. (New York Post.)
Biden’s lead is holding up in the national polls: “Fox News Poll: Biden holds commanding lead for Democratic nomination.”
Most “analysts” put down Biden’s lead to support for a candidate who can beat Trump. I wonder.
Not even Democrats want to be ruled by demonic females, who behave as if they’re permanently on the rag (as my grandpa Jack would have said).
* Image courtesy Dreamstime.com
Affirmative Action, Democrats, Egalitarianism, Propaganda, Race, Racism
“In 2009 just 28% of Democrats agreed with the statement ‘Racial discrimination is the main reason why black people can’t get ahead these days’; by the summer of 2017, that share had risen to 64%.”
From “African-Americans are the Democrats’ most loyal constituency.”
English, Feminism, Gender, Kids, Literature, Media, Propaganda, Sex, The Establishment
NEW COLUMN IS “The TV Tarts’ Reign Of Terror, Part 1.” (Yes, there’s more to come.) It’s currently on WND.COM and The Unz Review. All columns are archived on ilanamercer.com, under Weekly Column.
An excerpt:
The particular CNN segment I was watching concerned Fox News personality Tucker Carlson. It was meant to help terminate the controversial anchor’s career.
I recognized the sourpuss, dressed in marigold yellow, who was presiding over the seek-and-destroy mission, targeting the ultra-conservative Mr. Carlson.
She was no other than Poppy Harlow.
It transpires that years back, Carlson had routinely called into a Howard-Stern-like shock-jock radio show and made naughty comments, some about women. Women were “extremely primitive,” he had quipped.
To watch the countless, indistinguishable, ruthless, atavistic women empaneled on CNN, MSNBC, even Fox News—one cannot but agree as to the nature and caliber of the women privileged and elevated in our democracy, and by mass society, in general.
They’re certainly not women with the intellect and wit of a Margot Asquith—countess of Oxford, author and socialite (1864-1945). Would that women like Mrs. Asquith were permitted to put lesser “ladies” like CNN’s Ms. Harlow in their proper place.
When asked by American actress Jean Harlow how she pronounces her first name, Margot Asquith shot back, “The ‘t’ is silent, as in Harlow.”
Naturally, you’d have to have a facility with the English language to know what a “harlot” is.
You’d certainly need an education, as opposed to a degree, to recognize the next character referenced.
TV’s empaneled witches and their housebroken, domesticated boys are guided more by the spirit of Madame Defarge than by Lady Justice.
If parents saw to it that kids got an education, not merely a degree, the brats would know who Madam Defarge was.
But our uneducated ignoramuses no longer seek out the greatest literature ever. This is because the best books were penned by the pale, patriarchal penile people. Given this self-inflicted ignorance, few younger readers will know this most loathsome of literary icons, from “A Tale Of Two Cities” by Charles Dickens.
Madame Defarge is the bloodthirsty commoner, who sat knitting, as she watched the en masse public beheadings of innocent aristocrats (17,000 of them) in Paris, during the Reign of Terror, aka the French Revolution, whose symbol ought to be the guillotine. (Another 10,000 perished in prison sans due process.)
America’s modern-day Madam Defarges are the harridans who shrieked in vengeance on TV when a sentencing Judge, T. S. Ellis III, dared to cite Paul Manafort’s “otherwise blameless life.”
Manafort, formerly a Trump campaign adviser, will be jailed for seven-and-a-half years for non-violent “crimes” excavated by Grand Inquisitor Robert Mueller, and committed against that most wicked of government departments, the Internal Revenue Service. That a broken, frail, wheelchair-bound man might not die in jail enraged the wicked, pitiless witches of the networks.
Cheered on by our contemporary Madame Defarges, Manafort’s next sentencing Judge, an angry female, failed to limit her ambit to the application of the law, namely to sentencing. Instead, she lectured the defendant for a demeanor that displeased her, and for an inadequate display of contrition. Judge Amy Berman Jackson subjected a visibly broken Mr. Manafort to a vicious tongue-lashing. …
… READ THE REST. NEW COLUMN IS “The TV Tarts’ Reign Of Terror, Part 1.” It’s currently on WND.COM and The Unz Review.