Category Archives: Welfare

UPDATED: Workers Vs. Voters (Parasites Looking for a Host)

Democracy, Elections, Labor, Left-Liberalism And Progressivisim, Taxation, The State, Welfare

About the New Deal, H.L. Mencken quipped that it divided America into “those who work for a living and those who vote for a living.”

TIME magazine has chosen its archetype hero. He is the voter, not the worker, also known as that habitual “Protester.” The Protester sticks around for lack of anything else to do.

No wonder Tea Party America failed to make it into TIME’s pantheon of protesters. These middle-class, upstanding folks returned to “petty” duties like jobs, families and other such unworldly, provincial preoccupations.

Or in Barack Obama speak: Back they went to their guns, bibles, and bigotries.

Workers unite! You who bear the burden of taxes, unshakable yourselves. Break free from the chains with which the moochers and looters seek to imprison you (using the power of the state, naturally).

UPDATE (Dec. 25): The professional voters cost the professional workers a whole lot:

Los Angeles City Atty. Carmen Trutanich is considering a lawsuit against Occupy L.A. protesters to reimburse the city for damage caused during the occupation of the City Hall lawn. The two-month encampment cost the city at least $2.35 million, not counting repairs to the lawn and fountain outside City Hall, according to a report issued Friday.
Much of that cost — more than $1.7 million — will be added to the growing pool of red ink in this year’s city budget. The Occupy bills will increase an anticipated $72-million shortfall over the next six months, City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana said.

(LA Times)

The AG doesn’t say who she will sue and how. Parasites are like a big amorphous amoeba. This single-celled organism acts in unison because it’s so unevolved. Occupy L.A. is flopping about looking for a viable host.

Merry Xmas.
ilana

UPDATE II: Who’s It To Be? Teddy No. 1 or Teddy No. 2? (‘Nut Gingrich’)

Elections, Foreign Policy, Founding Fathers, History, Ilana Mercer, Nationhood, Neoconservatism, Political Philosophy, Politics, Republicans, Socialism, The State, War, Welfare

The excerpt is from “Who’s It To Be? Teddy No. 1 or Teddy No. 2?” now on WND.COM:

“What are the odds that a Democratic commander-in-chief and his chief Republican rival declare their philosophical fidelity to the Progressive Theodore Roosevelt on the same day?

In an effort to better conjure Roosevelt, the shameless Barack Obama had flown to Osawatomie in Kansas, where, in 1910, Teddy delivered his “New Nationalism Address.” So radical was the Roosevelt political program that its author was condemned as “‘Communistic,’ ‘Socialistic,’ and ‘Anarchistic’ in various quarters.”

On the day of this staged affair—in eerie synchronicity—Newt Gingrich, whose favorability among Republican “caucus goers” is at 33 percent and rising, described himself to broadcaster Glenn Beck as “a Theodore Roosevelt Republican.”

Back in the day, “the Eastern United States denounced [Roosevelt] as a ‘communist agitator.’” This was “the most radical speech ever given by an ex-President,” writes Robert S. La Forte in The Kansas Historical Quarterly:

“[Roosevelt’s] concepts of the extent to which a powerful federal government could regulate and use private property in the interest of the whole and his declarations about labor … were nothing short of revolutionary.”

As La Forte chronicles, “Roosevelt had no interest in retaining the ideals of Jeffersonian ‘state’s right’ demagogues, as he called them. He was interested in a Hamiltonian concept of power which he described as the ‘New Nationalism.’”

Roosevelt’s speech, seconded White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, “Really set the course for the 20th century.” Yet to listen to the president in Kansas, a vote for “a Theodore Roosevelt Republican” is a vote for a Mad-Max dystopia, where “everyone is left to fend for themselves and play by their own rules.”

Don’t look for a “square deal” from the characters on the other side of the aisle. “We want to avoid becoming a welfare state like the European states” is the stock phrase we get from GOP pointy heads. Truth is not their stock-in-trade. As they tell it, America has a long way to go before it turns as Rooseveltian as Europe. …”

The complete column is “Who’s It To Be? Teddy No. 1 or Teddy No. 2?” Read it now on WND.COM.

********
STAIRWAY PRESS HAS LAUNCHED A HOLIDAY GIVEAWAY AND FACEBOOK EVENT FOR MY BOOK, Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa.

Invitation have gone out from The Cannibal’s Facebook Fan page. (“Like” The Cannibal when you pop by.) On offer is Mercer merchandise galore. Every fifth buyer of Into the Cannibal’s Pot will receive a free copy of my libertarian manifesto Broad Sides: One Woman’s Clash with a Corrupt Culture, together with a CD of the progressive rock guitar virtuoso and composer Sean Mercer.

Order NOW and The Publisher will endeavor to deliver in time for Christmas.

And do please “Like” Into the Cannibal’s Pot’s Fan Page.

UPDATE I (Dec. 8): Nut Gingrich is what a a LRC.COM blogger has christened You Know Who, pointing out Nut’s support for “two governments in the United States: one that follows the Bill of Rights and one that doesn’t (for our “security,” of course).” MORE.

UPDATE II: More explosive details about “Newt’s grand schemes for a small, unintrusive federal government”: “NEWT PRESENTS A FRESH NEW VIRTUAL FACE” by Ann Coulter.

UPDATED: Miseducation Bubble (The Marketing Energizer Bunny)

Business, Debt, Economy, Education, Government, Welfare

“The housing house-of-cards was not the only ‘bubble in search of a pin’ in the modern-day USA. The intellectual bubble is also begging to be burst.” (May 8, 2009) Students have acquired an empty education—for example, a masters degree aimed at “working with nonprofit organizations”—so as to qualify for work in niche “specialties” which are very often spawned and sustained artificially by state-issued fiat money. “The second highest source of income [for nonprofits] is government grants or contracts.”

New York Post: “John Smith, 31, of Brooklyn, works part time at a Trader Joe’s because he hasn’t found work in his field for over a year, despite having a master’s degree. He has about $45,000 in student loan debt. His girlfriend, Meropi Peponides, 27, a graduate student at Columbia University, will have over $50,000 by the time she graduates. … Smith said he has sent out about 200 resumes in his search. He’s looking mainly for work with nonprofit organizations.”

“For the first time, Americans owe more on their student loans than they do on their credit-card bills, with a tally that could soon top $1 trillion — leaving millions of Americans with a crushing debt burden at a time when decent-paying jobs are scarce.”

MORE.

UPDATE (Oct. 24): THE MARKETING ENERGIZER BUNNY. As JP noted, one needs a formal education for a few highly skilled disciplines and professions. For the rest, the return to a classical, canon and core-curriculum oriented education—what used to be called traditionalist—is crucial in secondary school. Someone who can afford it ought to be encouraged to soak up the Western scientific, literary and philosophical canon as a first degree. But this elusive liberal arts, mind-growing education is rare and expensive.

Conservatives are no different from progressives in this matter. How often do you hear the mantra from Beck, “We need to teach kids how to think, not what to think.” Not you don’t! When you expose a child to the riches of the Western canon through top-down, teacher-focused teaching—his mind develops. Teach a youth of Socrates and his analytical method—and what do you think will happen over and above dendritic proliferation in the brain? Higher-order thinking. Ask a child to distill the central idea in a complex essay (which does not deal with diversity or other brain-deadening constructs). Don’t praise him when he gets it wrong. See how well PROCESS works for his thinking. The same holds with math, science, etc. This is what used to be called an education.

Back to fluffy bunny degrees. Marketing is another. The “marketing” types I’ve encountered know little and do NOTHING. They have various degrees and they write letters festooned with “enthusiasm,” “passion,” adoration for the product, Kumbaya, and the occasional obligatory requests for “feedback”—don’t waste your time; they’ll discard or have a panic attack if your recommendations entail pragmatic, result-oriented steps. That’s too much like work. A lunch meeting to discuss your “concerns” or “options”: now that’s the lingo and “action” they are comfortable with.

The marketing types I’ve encountered are incapable of planing and executing the most basic and logical of plans. In my case, they don’t know what an Alexa rank is, and so are positive that their site, ranked 16 millionth by Alexa is where your book sales originate. (Mine, of course, originate on ilanamercer.com, WND.COM and Amazon, and years of GRAFT.) They have no idea how to look at a client’s reach and product and match her with her target buyers. They are incapable of divining their client’s market and optimizing it. You’ve wasted scarce time and energy if you’ve written practical, logical, point-form suggestions for these types to follow.

Some “businessmen” derive masochistic pleasure from rotating these fluffy bunnies (as my husband calls the marketing persona), at considerable expense, one would imagine.

I believe that as an author who does most of the heavy lifting on these sites (which you all enjoy, and wish to support, I hope), I know more about marketing a book to a niche market than the marketing laggards I’ve encountered.

Alas, they draw the salaries. But economic reality is changing this last fact.

The one extremely bright person I have had the pleasure to work with on my last book project was a 20-year old home-schooled prodigy. No higher education. He learned superb programing skills through a mentoring program in his church. However, his intelligence, quick mind unpolluted by the public school, as well as an ability to think clearly and at a speed enabled him to branch out. Needless to say that such abilities and ethics are rare in our workforce. He was quickly poached for managing far bigger projects.

The latter programmer/developer was the only person I’ve worked with who was able to read an email (I number each task clearly. It’s the kind of methodical habit of mind one once acquired at school vicariously; at least I did), answer it, while addressing each of my points/concerns, and then promptly return a demo.

Frankly, well-structured, logical emails that enumerate tasks to be accomplished and problems to be solved have usually elicited a deathly silence in all other programmers/marketers with whom I’ve tried to engage. That’s scary!

Fortunately, and as I also learned in school, breathing is controlled by the autonomic nervous system. Were this not the case, the human energizer/fluffy bunny would already be extinct.

President Renews Vows With Coercive Labor

Barack Obama, Government, Labor, Socialism, Welfare

How cool: the local awful postal workers, about whom I wrote in “Warning: Postal Worker Coming to A Clinic Near You,” are feeling the heat. Last I visited the enormous, lavish, postal compound nearby, the place felt like a furnace; like the hell hole it is. The air conditioning had been turned off (for budgetary reasons, related a devoted USPS customer).

According to a not-exactly news worthy report from the New York Times (the bankruptcy of the United States Postal Service is old stuff), this inhospitable haven for state workers is living “on the financial edge … has never been as close to the precipice as it is today: the agency is so low on cash that it will not be able to make a $5.5 billion payment due this month and may have to shut down entirely this winter unless Congress takes emergency action to stabilize its finances.”

As is the case with all oink-sector enterprises,

… decades of contractual promises made to unionized workers, including no-layoff clauses, are increasing the post office’s costs. Labor represents 80 percent of the agency’s expenses, compared with 53 percent at United Parcel Service and 32 percent at FedEx, its two biggest private competitors. Postal workers also receive more generous health benefits than most other federal employees.

What do you know? At the same time that one of the many government-run outfits that is built on coercive, state-sponsored, unionized labor finds itself on the verge of financial collapse—the US president renews his vows to such a work force at a Labor-Day rally.