Category Archives: Morality

UPDATE III (5/3/021) LETTERS: On ‘Sovereign Nation’ With Michelle Malkin

Critical Race Theory, Ilana Mercer, Ilana On Radio & TV, Left-Liberalism And Progressivisim, Morality, Political Economy, Political Philosophy, Race, Racism, Republicans

The short segment aired on Michelle Malkin’s Sovereign Nation, on News Max TV, at 8:00 PM Eastern Time, Saturday, May 1.

Here is the video.
http://www.newsmaxtv.com/Shows/Michelle-Malkin-Sovereign-Nation/vid/1_yusm97em

It was a great honor to be asked on: Michelle doesn’t sit comfortably in an anchor’s chair like the other egos, feeding off the public’s (justifiable) fear and hopelessness; she acts. She fights for deplorables. She’s a warrior.

Our polity, state and civil society, is now based on anti-whiteness (ethnocidal levels thereof), plain and simple; not communism or identity politics.

UPDATE II (5/2/021) Fascinating LETTER From a Ms. Malkin fan:

*Dear Miss Mercer,*

* I just had to make contact with you by way of this electronic
mail message. My name is …. I tuned again to-day May 2nd, 2021 to
the Newsmax television news show, “Sovereign Nation”, hosted by Misses
Michelle Malkin. I caught you yesterday, the 1st of May, 2021 when it first
was telecast, and I just had to watch the rebroadcast this afternoon.*

* You prove that you’re a person who just does not remain satisfied
with knowledge but you pursue it, not afraid to bear the cross it can have
for one, yet you come out on top for your lack of fear. This is what I
want to point out. EXACTNESS OF LANGUAGE = PRECISE TERMINOLOGY.*

* A few years ago Mister Graham Ledger host of One America News’
“The Daily Ledger”, made popular the erroneous definition of Black Lives
Matter and AntiFascist as THE FASCIST LEFT. Quite a number of Conservative
news hosts such as Mister Sean Hannity jumped on the lack of effort
bandwagon. Likewise,there were and are others who would call
President Barack Hussein Obama a Communist, and going back in the years
many would be called Nazis, and by almost everyone then and now who do not
even know it’s an acronym for National Socialism. And this is where I must
compliment you, truly, for your understanding as to how mistaken these
persons are, and many like them by perpetually adopting terms inexactly. *

* They are lazy with language, many outrightly ignorant, with the
monikers they apply to ideas and persons. Anti-Fascist and Black Lives
Matter aren’t The Fascist Left, or are those in political power of the
Left. I coined a term, perhaps not 100% correct, that they are
Neo-Bolsheviks. The Fascist Left refers only to a two year period in Italy
beginning March 23rd, 1919 when Mister Benito Mussolini founded Fascism
and didn’t reemerge to be a prominent factor until the Italian Social
Republic from 1943-1945. I am keeping this simple. *

* You’re ever so right when you intelligently discard and call out for
the disuse and misuse of euphemisms such as Communists and so forth for the
mentally unstable Far Left in this country and elsewhere. I have said to my
wife and some friends that if one continues to use these
shibboleths such as the many cerebrally slothful and witless politicians
and news commentators-interviewers of the Myopic Right, both Conservative
and Libertarian, what they’re actually doing and accomplishing is
the anesthetization of the people, **Americans and perhaps others,** into
a state of inactivity except only to enact their revolutionary, heavens,
patriotic duty of casting a vote in democratic elections. The average
person is clueless as to what they are really having to confront, and in my
opinion even more brutally so, are the victims of it. It’s as if on a
silver platter gilded in gold they gladly accept what these political hacks
and pundits of deliberate dumbing down misinform them, which procreates
disinformation, ergo the real nature of the enemy will never be understood.

The lack of comprehension of what the reality of the situation is, oddly
enough gives birth to a comfort and security that people assume to know
what they are really up against, and conversely only assists the Left
opposition which, in fact, accurately states that these political extreme
labels are scaremongering and witch hunt tactics. *

* May God Bless You Ilana Mercer

UPDATE II (5/3): The same gentleman is galvanized to spread the word about the work done here:

Dear Friends,

What a find! And another exceptional woman with a mind! I discovered her when [watching] Misses Michelle Malkin’s show “Sovereign Nation” on the television network, Newsmax. She is for absolute freedom, of course outside the boundaries of true crime being permitted, and isn’t without a moral criterion. A different type of Libertarian, Paleo-Libertarian. Now, I am not a Libertarian, I’m an Eclectic and I do not categorize myself except for being Christcentric, but please give this highly cultured and very positive individualistic lady a chance. I can tell you right now, with her as a Head Of State, persons some of you know and have known or anyone for whatever free speech, would not at present be incarcerated or have their civil liberties abused, as long as it is not promoting crime, such as homicide, and sexual child abuse, and similar.

The following three LINKS are for the Misses Malkin show, where Misses Mercer is interviewed beginning at the twenty-first minute fifty-first second (21:57). NOTA BENE: Misses Malkin was refused to appear and speak at The Conservative Political Action Conference. She’s banned!

https://www.newsmaxtv.com/Shows/Michelle-Malkin-Sovereign-Nation/vid/1_yusm97em

The second is for a very likable Englishman whom I am delighted to be introduced to by Misses Mercer, Mister David Vance. This interview runs thirty-seven minutes and twenty seconds (37:20)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKuAmL7Gpcw&authuser=0

The third LINK you should study through. She’s unique even amongst Conservatives, Libertarians, and any of The Traditional Right. Very very close to my views. A great find; take your time to read through her writings:

https://www.ilanamercer.com/quotables/

God Bless

UPDATED (5/7/021): NEW COLUMN: On The Backs Of Poor Whites? How J.D. Vance Elites Become Elites

Celebrity, Conservatism, Critique, IMMIGRATION, Morality, Multiculturalism, Nationhood, Political Correctness, Race, Racism, Relatives, Republicans

NEW COLUMN IS “On The Backs Of Poor Whites? How J.D.-Vance Elites Become Elites“. It’s currently on WND.COM and The Unz Review.

“On The Backs Of Poor Whites?” was briefly featured on the American Greatness, to approving reader commentary—then it vanished. Pulled? As the column indicated, Soy Boy Vance has some powerful friends. Nothing else would muscle my brave publishers. Con Ick. (Conservatism Inc.) likely wants to run Vance as a political candidate. This likely means Con Ick. has no time for Appalachian Aunt Ruth’s bitter feelings about his kind of elites.

An excerpt:

The country is fast descending into a Dantean hell.

The Circles of Hell into which we’ve been signed, sealed and delivered are mass migration, diversity, multiculturalism, and zealous, institutionalized anti-whiteness, with its attendant de-civilization and inversion of long-held societal morals and mores.

The guiding ghost of Virgil is nowhere to be found. To ostensibly shepherd us out of hell, however, assorted serpents have slithered forth.

Beware! All the more so when they speak to you from bastions of the establishment—Newsweek is one—as J. D. Vance does in, “True ‘Compassion’ Requires Secure Borders and Stopping Illegal Immigration.

His is the typically conciliatory, “conservative” argument we’ve come to expect from the gilded elite, regarding America’s promiscuous immigration policy, under Republicans and Democrats alike.

Vance is the best-selling author of Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis, which is a culturally compliant—namely unflattering—account of poor, white America.

Provided your thesis allows for a cozy convergence of agreeable storylines—you are well-positioned to peddle a national bestseller to the approving the left, libertarian, neoconservative and pseudo-conservative smart-set.

Yes, Vance is a sellout. Not that they were asked for their take, but the archetypal folks depicted in Hillbilly Elegy contend, justifiably, that “Vance [is] not an authentic hillbilly or an example of the working class.”

Cassie Chambers Armstrong’s Aunt Ruth, for example.

Aunt Ruth didn’t think much of Vance’s endeavor. Her niece is an Appalachian and author of a redeeming tale, Hill Women: Finding Family and a Way Forward in the Appalachian Mountains.

Hillbilly Elegy’s portrayal of Appalachia,” explains Chambers, “is designed to elevate Vance above the community from which he came … it seeks to tell his story in a way that aligns with a simplistic rags-to-riches narrative. Think critically about how that narrative influences the way we are taught to think about poverty, progress, and identity.”

Chambers is perceptively correct. It’s cringe worthy—Uriah Heep slimy—but Vance all but advertises that the Indian-American Brahmin he wed has helped “rid him of his hillbilly ways.” To that end, he tells of a mild exchange with his wife: “Don’t make excuses for weakness. I didn’t get here by making excuses for failure,” he “hollers” at her.

These unremarkable, muted words Vance had with wife Usha Chilukuri he frames, self-servingly, as “the baggage of his tumultuous upbringing.” Wow!

Self-deprecation over nothing much at all amounts to very clever self-aggrandizement. Vance’s casuistry resembles a kind of Argument From Fake Modesty.

Indeed, in smug self-aggrandizement, Vance slimes his hillbilly relatives, even naming names. Credits and kudos go to the Chilukuris, wife Usha’s relatives, for “[teaching] him what a functional family looked like.”

From family unit to family unification policy: When discussing immigration, J. D. Vance is just as nimble …

…Read the rest. NEW COLUMN IS “On The Backs Of Poor Whites? How J.D.-Vance Elites Become Elites“. It appeared on WND.COM and The Unz Review.

Columns are always published eventually on IlanaMercer.com  Sign-up.

*Image via CapX

UPDATE (5/7/021):

 

Go From ‘Bitch Mode’ To ‘Beast Mode’: Quit Toxic Conservatism And Become Dangerously Good!

Conservatism, Constitution, Critique, GUNS, Individual Rights, Individualism Vs. Collectivism, Morality, Political Philosophy, Politics, Republicans

IMPORTANT READING comes from Jack Kerwick on American Greatness.

If you have settled back into those asinine, conservative talking points—“the Left this; the Left that; socialism this; socialism that; we are not racists; they are racists; ‘systemic anti-whiteness’ is the Democrats’ fault”—you need an intervention, S.O.S; you need to pull yourself together, and stop it!

Right away!

Read the antidote: “Good People Must Be Dangerous People: Fear is the only language the violent comprehend” by Jack Kerwick.

Quickly.

An excerpt:

“…Conservatism, Inc.’s leaders are looking out for themselves. Their standard operating procedure is the stuff of wusses and whiners—but certainly not winners. Decent people, and decent men specifically, know that in the last analysis, it is they and they alone—and not, as those in Big Conservatism would have us think, state agents—who are the last line of defense protecting innocents from predators. This being the case, the decent know that they must become ruthless.

… If they were alive today, the founders would insist that decent folks who want to live good lives and protect themselves, their loved ones, and other law-abiding citizens in their communities from danger most definitely not follow the example of “conservative leaders,” whether in government or anywhere else, who are only interested in adjusting their bowties, wagging their fingers, and shrieking and crying over the Left’s ‘double standards’ while conning their constituents into thinking that they are ‘fighting the Left.’””

… A must read:

Good People Must Be Dangerous People: Fear is the only language the violent comprehend” by Jack Kerwick.

*Image courtesy of American Greatness

Revolving Door Between Cable Media And DC Duopoly

America, Critique, Democrats, Ethics, Iran, Media, Morality, Republicans

The revolving door between cable media, neoliberal (CNN) or neocon (Fox), and the D.C. duopoly is sickening. Whether practiced by the Left or the Right; this revolving door between politics and the media is indisputably a moral, if not a legal, conflict of interest.

Fox News has hired warmonger Mike Pompeo. The skirts from the Trump administration, ideologically insignificant all, are on the Fox payroll. Corrupt—neither is the content smart: all day long it’s “the poor Uyghurs, invade Iran.”

Naturally, examples abound on the other side.